Cases 151 - 160 of 873
In re: Randall James Lanham, Esq.
as 20-80094
Respondent:
In re: RANDALL JAMES LANHAM, Esquire, Admitted to the bar of the Ninth Circuit: June 15, 1993
June Domino v. California Correctional Health, et al
as 20-16156
Defendant / Appellee:
AFSCME LOCAL 2620 and CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUNE M. DOMINO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv04752
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv04775
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
James P. Armstrong, Esq.In re: James P. Armstrong, Esq.
as 20-80073
Respondent:
In re: JAMES P. ARMSTRONG, Esquire, Admitted to the bar of the Ninth Circuit: June 24, 2003,
Rossana Figuerola v. USDC-CALA
as 20-71096
Petitioner:
ROSSANA FIGUEROLA, Trustee of the Figuerola Family Trust Dated June, 2005
Not Classified By Court:
In re: ROSSANA FIGUEROLA, Trustee of the Figuerola Family Trust Dated June, 2005 and NATIONWIDE AGRIBUSINESS INSURANCE COMPANY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Mustafanos v. Ford et al
as 3:2020cv00237
Defendant:
David O'Mara, Ed Anderson, Christina Lovato and others
Plaintiff:
Yosef Le Roi Mustafanos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv03340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Mark A. Werner, Esq.In re: Mark A. Werner, Esq.
as 20-80064
Respondent:
In re: MARK WERNER, Admitted to the bar of the Ninth Circuit June 3, 2003
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00635
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
