Cases 11 - 20 of 2,156
Lowther v. City of Newport Beach, et al.
as 24-2185
Plaintiff:
JAMES LOWTHER
Defendant:
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, ADMINSURE, INC. and MICHAEL REED, Claims Liability Manager
Kulick v. Olmstead, et al.
as 24-2129
Plaintiff:
R. J. KULICK
Defendant:
REED H. OLMSTEAD, LAW OFFICES OF REED H. OLMSTEAD and DOES, 1-100, inclusive
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00507
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Rankin v. Google
as 6:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
Lawson Reed Rankin
Defendant:
Google
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Khan v. Stricklin, et al.
as 24-1446
Plaintiff:
MUHAMMAD KHAN
Defendant:
ROBIN STRICKLIN, SEAN TUMACDER, LORENA GOMEZ and others
Reed v. Unknown
as 3:2024cv00355
Petitioner:
Mychal Reed
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John Davidson et al v. Construction Teamsters Training and Upgrading Fund for Southern California et al
as 2:2024cv01324
Plaintiff:
John Davidson, Carly Reed and Karen Welch
Defendant:
Construction Teamsters Training and Upgrading Fund for Southern California, Construction Teamsters Apprenticeship Fund for Southern California, Construction Teamsters Contract Compliance Fund for Southern California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
(PC) McEwen v. Driscoll et al
as 2:2024cv00479
Plaintiff:
Darel McEwen
Defendant:
Michael Driscoll, Johnathan Reed, Carly Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Eugene School District 4J, et al.
as 24-789
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL REED, as Next of Friend to M.R.
Defendant:
EUGENE SCHOOL DISTRICT 4J, PAULA MCCOWN, JONATHAN ANDREW DEY, JR. and others
Reed v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2024cv00877
Plaintiff:
Samuel Reed
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
