Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 463
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv00698
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Waller v. City of Nogales, et al.
as 24-1864
Plaintiff: CORA J. WALLER, on her own behalf and as a personal representative of the estate of Glen Ray Cockrum, Jr.
Defendant: CITY OF NOGALES, ROY BERMUDEZ, COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ and others
Molina De Acevedo, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1848
Petitioner: KARLA MELISSA MOLINA DE ACEVEDO, MAILYN ALONDRA ACEVEDO-MOLINA and ADONYS GILBERTO ACEVED-QUINTANILLA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01289
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Olivares-Acevedo v. Garland
as 24-1021
Petitioner: ANGEL OMAR OLIVARES-ACEVEDO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Bravo Acevedo v. Herbst et al
as 1:2024cv00125
Plaintiff: Maria Consuelo Bravo Acevedo
Defendant: Gary Herbst, Brian Poochigian, Terry A. Sayre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Segura Acevedo v. Garland
as 23-4266
Petitioner: IGNACIO SEGURA ACEVEDO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Frank Dominguez v. County of Los Angeles California et al
as 2:2023cv10523
Plaintiff: Frank Dominguez
Defendant: County of Los Angeles California, Juan Madrigal, Kathryn Barger and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv02436
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Smith v. Diaz, et al.
as 23-3551
Plaintiff / Appellant: LAWRENCE CHRISTOPHER SMITH
Defendant / Appellee: RALPH DIAZ, XAVIER BECERRA, KEITH L. FAGUNDES and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?