Cases 11 - 20 of 53,703
Vega Lorente v. Garland
as 24-3215
Petitioner:
SABASTIAN ANTONIO VEGA LORENTE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rodriguez Rafael v. Garland
as 24-3206
Petitioner:
JOSE OSWVALDO RODRIGUEZ RAFAEL
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Lindsey #333281 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv01150
Petitioner:
Jason Christopher Lindsey, Jr.
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dayton #355356 v. Thornell et al
as 4:2024cv00257
Petitioner:
Robert Guy Dayton, Jr.
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell, Staci Ibarra and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez-Cruz, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3159
Petitioner:
EVELYN YANIRA RODRIGUEZ-CRUZ and JEROBOAM OSEAS NATANAHEL NAJAERA-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Mi Familia Vota, et al. v. Petersen, et al.
as 24-3188
Plaintiff:
MI FAMILIA VOTA, VOTO LATINO, LIVING UNITED FOR CHANGE IN ARIZONA and others
Defendant:
ADRIAN FONTES, in his official capacity as Arizona Secretary of State, KRIS MAYES, ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL, in her official capacity as Arizona Attorney General, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Intervenor:
WARREN PETERSEN, President of the Arizona Senate, BEN TOMA, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives and REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE
Hernandez Benitez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3160
Petitioner:
CARMEN YESSENIA HERNANDEZ BENITEZ and DILAN JAFET RODRIGUEZ HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Azcarate v. Williams, et al.
as 24-3174
Petitioner:
RAY ANTONIO AZCARATE
Respondent:
BRIAN WILLIAMS, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Porto Queiroz, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3168
Petitioner:
JACSON PORTO QUEIROZ, VANESSA OLIVEIRA QUEIROZ, ANA BEATRIZ OLIVEIRA QUEIROZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
