Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Warner Bros Home Entertainment Inc v. David Cook et al
as 2:2012cv07757
Defendant:
David Cook and Does
Plaintiff:
Warner Bros Home Entertainment Inc
Metabyte, Inc. v. Nvidia Corporation et al
as 4:2012cv00044
Plaintiff:
Metabyte, Inc.
Defendant:
Nvidia Corporation, David Cook, Viatcheslav Gostrenko and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Adams et al v. Van Camp & Deissner et al
as 2:2009cv00493
Plaintiff:
Jon M Adams, Jon M Adams, Rae Jeanne Adams and others
Defendant:
Van Camp & Deissner, donald r shaw, David Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Soon J. Ishikawa et al v. Quality Loan Service et al
as 2:2009cv03411
Plaintiff:
Soon J. Ishikawa and Glen Song
Defendant:
Quality Loan Service, Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01813
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv05928
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Bone et al v. Smithkline Beecham Corporation et al
as 3:2007cv05886
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Bone, David Cook, Jesus Cota and others
Defendant:
Smithkline Beecham Corporation, Smithkline Beecham Corporation, McKesson Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hardy et al v. El Dorado et al
as 2:2007cv00799
Plaintiff:
Tim Hardy and Darlene Hardy
Defendant:
County of El Dorado, David Cook, Tony's Tow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cintas Corporation v. Ault et al
as 3:2006cv05110
Petitioner:
Cintas Corporation
Respondent:
Travis M. Ault, Larry D. Chesser, David Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
