Cases 11 - 20 of 6,975
Melba Ortega v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2024cv03687
Plaintiff:
Melba Ortega
Defendant:
a municipal entity COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, an individual KONRAD THIEME and DOES 1-10 Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James Worldwide, Inc. v. Steam Logistics, LLC et al
as 8:2024cv00930
Plaintiff:
James Worldwide, Inc.
Defendant:
Steam Logistics, LLC and Does 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
X.D. et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 8:2024cv00902
Plaintiff:
X. D. and X. C.
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, Deputy Ty Shelton and Does 1-10 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03248
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Michael Brang v. Treble Health, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv03242
Plaintiff:
Michael Brang
Defendant:
Treble Health, LLC and DOES 1-10 Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Ferris Foster v. Antonie J. Freeman et al
as 2:2024cv03255
Plaintiff:
Ferris Foster
Defendant:
Antoine J. Freeman and Does 1-10, Inclusive
Zakarya v. Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, et al.
as 24-2459
Plaintiff:
BEN ZAKARYA
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a California corporation and DOES, 1-10 inclusive
Ezor v. Yee, et al.
as 24-2435
Plaintiff:
A. EDWARD EZOR
Defendant:
BETTY T. YEE, STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, LEAH T. WILSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
