Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Jeremy Lafitte v. Unknown
as 22-15015
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMY LAFITTE, In Rem: Secured Property rights and interest in all assets owned or possessed by DoorDash inc. and the proceeds of sale and transfer of all assets as surety for breach of obligations in the amount of $200,000.00
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN
Piero Bugoni v. Checkr, Inc., et al
as 21-16994
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PIERO A. BUGONI
Defendant / Appellee:
CHECKR, INC., DOORDASH, INC., INSTACART, INC. and others
Antosi v. DoorDash, Inc.
as 3:2021cv08096
Plaintiff:
IDEDA ANTOSI
Defendant:
Doordash, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Doordash, Inc. et al v. City and County of San Francisco
as 3:2021cv05502
Plaintiff:
Doordash, Inc. and GrubHub Inc.
Defendant:
San Francisco City and County and City and County of San Francisco
Amicus Curiae:
Chamber of Commerce of the United State of America and California Chamber of Commerce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statutes
Thayer v. Uber, Inc. - Uber Eat's et al
as 4:2021cv03936
Defendant:
Doordash, Inc.,, IHeart Radio, Answear United and others
Plaintiff:
Zachary Thayer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Dow v. Doordash, Inc.
as 3:2021cv01122
Plaintiff:
Terry Dow
Defendant:
Doordash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Lona's Lil Eats, LLC v. DoorDash, Inc.
as 3:2020cv06703
Plaintiff:
Lona's Lil Eats, LLC
Defendant:
DoorDash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Saunders v. Doordash, Inc.
as 4:2020cv05825
Plaintiff:
Kevin Saunders
Defendant:
Doordash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Linn et al v. Doordash, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00666
Plaintiff:
Clifford Linn, John Gregorio and Baxter Gipson
Defendant:
Doordash, Inc.
Yvette DeAnda v. Doordash, Inc.
as 4:2019cv08305
Defendant:
Doordash, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Yvette DeAnda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
