Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Ford v. Asset Acceptance, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv02626
Plaintiff:
Cheval Ford
Defendant:
Asset Acceptance, LLC and Fulton, Friedman & Gullace, LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Brittingham v. Asset Acceptance,LLC et al
as 3:2013cv02614
Plaintiff:
Robert K. Brittingham
Defendant:
Asset Acceptance, LLC and Fulton Friedman & Gullace, LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Lane v. Asset Acceptance, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv01931
Plaintiff:
William Lane
Defendant:
Asset Acceptance, LLC and Fulton Friedman & Gullace, LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Asaoka v. Fulton, Friedman & Gullace, LLP et al
as 3:2013cv01740
Plaintiff:
Cord M. Asaoka
Defendant:
Fulton, Friedman & Gullace, LLP and Asset Acceptance, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Kenneth White v. Fulton Friedman & Gullace LLP et al
as 5:2013cv01207
Defendant:
Asset Acceptance LLC and Fulton Friedman & Gullace LLP
Plaintiff:
Kenneth White
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv01212
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nencini v. Asset Acceptance, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv00467
Plaintiff:
Maricela Nencini
Defendant:
Asset Acceptance, LLC, Ann Merrill, Esq., Fulton, Friedman & Gullace, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rodriguez v. Asset Acceptance, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv00177
Plaintiff:
Josefina Rodriguez
Defendant:
Asset Acceptance, LLC , Fulton, Friedman & Gullace, LLP and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Wilson v. Fulton, Friedman & Gullace LLP et al
as 2:2012cv00815
Plaintiff:
Richard Wilson
Defendant:
Fulton, Friedman & Gullace LLP and Asset Acceptance LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Shoemaker v. Fulton, Friedman & Gullace LLP et al
as 2:2011cv02299
Plaintiff:
Jon Shoemaker
Defendant:
Fulton, Friedman & Gullace LLP and Asset Acquisition Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
