Cases 11 - 20 of 37
(PC) Humphries v. Curry
as 2:2022cv00090
Plaintiff:
Daryle L. Humphries
Defendant:
P. Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FenceScreen, Inc. v. D.C. Humphrys Co. et al
as 2:2021cv06940
Plaintiff:
FenceScreen, Inc.
Defendant:
D.C. Humphrys Co. and Ronald B. Nissenbaum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FenceScreen, Inc. v. D.C. Humphrys Co. et al
as 8:2021cv01406
Plaintiff:
FenceScreen, Inc.
Defendant:
D.C. Humphrys Co. and Ronald B. Nissenbaum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
D.H. et al v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv07250
Defendant:
eLiquitech, Inc., James Monsees, Altria Enterprises LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Humphries and D.H.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Humphries v. Newsome et al
as 3:2020cv00659
Defendant:
L. Saido, M.D., Akinwuml, M.D., A. Sazon and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Humphries
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Humphries et al v. JUUL Labs, Inc
as 3:2019cv06497
Defendant:
JUUL Labs, Inc
Plaintiff:
D.H. and Cheryl Humphries
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: Juul Labs, Inc., Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation
as 3:2019md02913
Plaintiff:
Virginia Jose Angullo, Tracie Kugler, M.C. and others
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Holdfast Vapors LLC and others
Interested Party:
Danielle Mason and Matthew Blomquist
Petitioner:
Ethan Cooper, Alex Zike, Javon Clark and others
Special Master:
Thomas J. Perrelli and Honorable Gail A. Andler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Humphries v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2019cv05091
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Plaintiff:
Lilian Humphries
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Humphries v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 3:2018cv04017
Plaintiff:
Raymond M. Humphries
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Felton Ladell Humphries v. S. Sherman
as 2:2018cv05748
Respondent:
S. Sherman
Petitioner:
Felton Ladell Humphries, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
