Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 119
(PC) Martinez v. Jimenez, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00177
Plaintiff: William Martinez
Defendant: M Jimenez, J. G. Lopez, R. Redding and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ghanshyam D. Pokal et al v. Hardik A. Patel et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2022cv02276
Plaintiff: Ghanshyam D. Pokal, Geeta G. Pokal and Geeta Pokal
Defendant: Hardik A. Patel, Ashwin Kumar Patel, Meenaben A. Patel and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
J. D. v. Hoyoung Huh, et al
as 22-16694
Not Classified By Court: In re: JUUL LABS, INC., MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: J. D., through his parent and natural guardian Nicole Dramis, M. C., through his Parent and Natural Guardian Jeanine Manning, O. V., a minor, through her parent and natural guardian Tanya Viti and others
Defendant / Appellant: HOYOUNG HUH, NICHOLAS PRITZKER and RIAZ VALANI
Defendant: JUUL LABS, INC., ALTRIA GROUP, INC., PAX LABS, INC. and others
Tania Osuna et al v. Rite-Aid Corporation et al
as 5:2022cv01576
Plaintiff: Tania Osuna, Tania Osuna, as Guardian Ad Litem of J.G., Minor, and E.A., Minor, J. G. and others
Defendant: Rite-Aid Corporation, Target Corporation and Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Yessica Portillo et al v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
as 2:2022cv06404
Plaintiff: Yessica Portillo, Yessica Portillo, as Guardian Ad Litem of J.G.B.P. and G.B.P., Minors, J. G. B.P. and others
Defendant: CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
In re: J.D., et al v. Altria Group, Inc., et al
as 22-80061
Not Classified By Court: In re: JUUL LABS, INC., MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Petitioner: ALTRIA GROUP, INC., PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., ALTRIA CLIENT SERVICES LLC and others
Respondent: JUUL LABS, INC., J. D., through his parent and natural guardian Nicole Dramis, M. C., through his Parent and Natural Guardian Jeanine Manning and others
Defendant: GREGORY LEHMAN, TAGGART KNUTSON, PAX LABS, INC. and others
Amicus Curiae: WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION
In re: J. D., et al v. Juul Labs, Inc.
as 22-80063
Not Classified By Court: In re: JUUL LABS, INC., MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Respondent: J. D., through his parent and natural guardian Nicole Dramis, M. C., through his Parent and Natural Guardian Jeanine Manning, O. V., a minor, through her parent and natural guardian Tanya Viti and others
Defendant: PAX LABS, INC., NU MARK LLC, JAMES MONSEES and others
Petitioner: JUUL LABS, INC.
Amicus Curiae: WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION
Gevargiz et al v. Walgreens Boots Alliance We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv04439
Plaintiff: Madonna Gevargiz and J. G. V.
Defendant: Walgreens Boots Alliance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Board of Trustees of the Laborers Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California et al v. J.G. UNIVERSAL LANDSCAPE, INC.
as 4:2022cv02054
Plaintiff: Board of Trustees of the Laborers Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California, Board of Trustees of the Laborers Vacation-Holiday Trust Fund for Northern California, Board of Trustees of the Laborers Pension Trust Fund for Northern California and others
Defendant: J.G. UNIVERSAL LANDSCAPE, INC. and J. G. Universal Landscape, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company v. Gateways for Youth & Families et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv05041
Plaintiff: Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
Defendant: Gateways for Youth & Families fka Mentor House, J. S., A. N. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Type: Contract Insurance

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?