Cases 11 - 20 of 132
Emanuel Finch, Sr. v. State of Washington, et al
as 22-35696
Petitioner / Appellant:
EMANUEL L. FINCH, Sr.
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF WASHINGTON and JAMES KEY, Superintendent, Airway Heights Corrections Center
Laferriere v. Key et al
as 2:2022cv00125
Plaintiff:
Scott Laferriere, Sophia Laferriere and Graham Sherrill
Defendant:
James Key, Riverce, Deunich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sherrill v. Key et al
as 2:2022cv00132
Plaintiff:
Graham Sherrill
Defendant:
James Key, Riverce, Deunich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boot v. Key
as 2:2022cv00678
Petitioner:
Kevin L Boot
Respondent:
James Key
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Department of Corrections of AHCC et al
as 2:2022cv00081
Petitioner:
Kirk Williams
Respondent:
Department of Corrections of AHCC and Attorney James Key
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daniel Lazcano v. James Key
as 22-35315
Petitioner / Appellant:
DANIEL LAZCANO
Respondent / Appellee:
JAMES KEY
Finch v. State of Washington
as 3:2022cv05255
Petitioner:
Emanuel Leonard Finch, Sr
Respondent:
State of Washington and James Key
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barrett v. Key
as 2:2022cv00059
Petitioner:
Darrick L Barrett
Respondent:
James Key
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Joe Mata v. James Key
as 22-35269
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOE MATA
Respondent / Appellee:
JAMES KEY, Superintendent, Airway Heights Corrections Center
Thurura et al v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2022cv00037
Defendant:
Zina Blancher, State of Washington, Mark Abbott and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Thurura, Dustin G Abrams, Daniel Lazcono and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
