Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Jeffrey Katz Chiropratic, Inc., v. Diamond Respiratory Care, Inc.
as 3:2020cv04108
Defendant:
Diamond Respiratory Care, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Katz Chiropratic, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Katz v. Allied Medical Technology, Inc.
as 3:2020cv04128
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Katz
Defendant:
Allied Medical Technology, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Jeffrey Katz Chiropratic, Inc. v. iBeat, Inc.
as 3:2020cv02097
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Katz Chiropratic, Inc.
Defendant:
iBeat, Inc., d/b/a 100Plus and IBeat, Inc. a Delaware Corporation doing business as 100PLUS
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Dhesi et al v. Practice Wealth Ltd
as 3:2020cv01346
Plaintiff:
Sarbjit Dhesi and Jeffrey Katz
Defendant:
Practice Wealth Ltd
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Katz v. Dyansys, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv01081
Defendant:
Dyansys, Inc. and Srini Nageshwar
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Katz
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Katz v. Contra Costa Self Help Foundation Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv04587
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Katz
Defendant:
Contra Costa Self Help Foundation Inc. and Tunisia Ismalia Evans Al-Salahuddin
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Katz v. Patient Builders, Inc.
as 3:2019cv04339
Defendant:
Patient Builders, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Katz
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Jeffrey Katz Chiropractic, Inc. v. Tivity Health Support, LLC
as 4:2018cv05400
Defendant:
Tivity Health Support, LLC
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Katz Chiropractic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
McWeeny v. Atmel et al
as 5:2008cv01031
Plaintiff:
Patrick McWeeny, Patrick McWeeny, Patrick McWeeny and others
Defendant:
Corporation Atmel, George Perlegos, Gust Perlegos and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Malcolm v. Law Offices Adam Jeffrey Katz, PA
as 2:2007cv01046
Plaintiff:
Jim & Kelly Malcolm
Defendant:
Law Offices Adam Jeffrey Katz, PA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
