Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Destinni Mardesich v. Roderick Hickman, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-55404
Petitioner - Appellant: DESTINNI MARDESICH
Respondent - Appellee: RODERICK Q. HICKMAN, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, JOSEPH MCGRATH, Chief Deputy Secretary for Adult Operations, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, JOHN DOVEY, Director of Division of Adult Institutions, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Carlos Robledo v. Joseph McGrath et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2004cv04035
Respondent: Bill Lockyer and Joseph McGrath
Petitioner: Carlos Robledo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Muhammad v. Woodford, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2004cv01856
Petitioner: Ansar El Muhammad
Respondent: Joseph McGrath , S. Ornaski , James E. Tilton and others
Movant: Clerk of the Superior Court, County of Sacramento
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2003cv03174
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jones v. McGrath, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2002cv02276
Petitioner: Edward David Jones
Respondent: Joseph McGrath and Attorney General for the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. McGrath, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2002cv01671
Petitioner: Tyrone Daniel Johnson
Respondent: Attorney General for the State of California and Joseph McGrath
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cate v. Ayers, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:1999cv01466
Petitioner: Eugene Robert Cate
Respondent: Joseph McGrath and Jeanne S. Woodford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?