Cases 11 - 20 of 9,639
United States of America v. Lopez
as 24-3782
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
STEPHEN B LOPEZ
Lopez v. Aldayem et al
as 2:2024cv01126
Plaintiff:
Juan Porter Lopez
Defendant:
Ahmad A Aldayem and Trucking Masters LLC dba Trucking Masters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Rodriguez-Lopez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3750
Petitioner:
MARIA GLADYS RODRIGUEZ-LOPEZ and ASHLY ESTEFANY ESCALANTE-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
(SS) Lopez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv01721
Plaintiff:
Jason Russell Lopez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Isaacs v. City of Susanville et al
as 2:2024cv01707
Plaintiff:
Michael Isaacs
Defendant:
City of Susanville, Jerrad Lopez, Michael Hoover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gabarrete-Lopez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3723
Petitioner:
ERLIN MARILIN GABARRETE-LOPEZ, GENESIS NICOLLE VALLECILLO-GABARRETE and MARILIN FERNANDA VALLECILLO-GABARRETE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Calderon Lopez, et al. v. Sunset Housing Solutions L.P.
as 24-3718
Plaintiff:
RICARDO JOSE CALDERON LOPEZ, File on Demand No Attorney for Corporation and STARLIGHT ENTERTAINMENT ENTERPRISES, INC
Defendant:
SUNSET HOUSING SOLUTIONS L.P.
Calderon Lopez v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transport Authority, et al.
as 24-3717
Plaintiff:
RICARDO JOSE CALDERON LOPEZ
Defendant:
LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORT AUTHORITY and CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS
Hernandez-Lopez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3725
Petitioner:
ERNESTO HERNANDEZ-LOPEZ and AURA ALICIA SANCHEZ ALDANA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
5th St Loft LLC v. George R. Lopez et al
as 2:2024cv05023
Plaintiff:
5th St Loft LLC
Defendant:
George R Lopez, Heather Carrie and Does 1 to 10
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
