Cases 11 - 20 of 156
Marcus Ruben Ellington v. State of California et al
as 2:2014cv04364
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, M. Cate, M. Cate and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Ruben Ellington
Do v. Cates
as 5:2014cv02160
Petitioner:
Hung N Do
Respondent:
M. Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pablo Morales v. USDC-SAC
as 14-70921
:
In re: PABLO MORALES
Petitioner:
PABLO MORALES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Real Party In Interest:
M. CATES, KATHLEEN ALLISON, Warden and K. SANTORO
Michael D. Harrison v. D. Paramo et al
as 3:2014cv00376
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Harrison
Defendant:
D Paramo, M Cate, D Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ronnell Hill v. M. Cate, et al
as 14-15282
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONNELL RAY HILL
Defendant - Appellee:
M. CATE, F. GONZALEZ, K. HOLLAND and others
Michael D. Harrison v. D. Paramo et al
as 2:2014cv00638
Defendant:
M. Cate, M. Cate, D. Hernandez and others
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Harrison
Hernandez v. Beard et al
as 5:2013cv05633
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Hernandez
Defendant:
M. Cate, J. Beard, G. D. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eric Knapp v. USDC-CAFR
as 13-73365
:
In re: ERIC CHARLES RODNEY KNAPP
Petitioner:
ERIC CHARLES RODNEY KNAPP
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
Real Party In Interest:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS & REHABILITATION, SIERRA CONSERVATION CENTER, CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES and others
Paul Adams v. K. Raske, et al
as 13-56670
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
K. RASKE, Law Library Tech Assistant, LTA, D. STONE, Academic Vice Principal, AVP, S. CAFFERELLA, Academic Vice Principal, AVP and others
Brooks v. Cate et al
as 1:2013cv01276
Plaintiff:
Steven D. Brooks
Defendant:
M. Cate, R. Pimental, Rick Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
