Cases 11 - 18 of 18
The Eclipse Group LLP v. Target Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv01411
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc., Menard, Inc., Kmart Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
The Eclipse Group LLP
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Stephen Michael Lobbin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc
Darrell Greenland v. Chervon Holdings Limited
as 2:2012cv09747
Defendant:
Chervon Holdings Limited, Chervon North America Inc, Lowe's Companies Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell Greenland
Aviva Sports Inc et al v. Fingerhut Direct Marketing Inc et al
as 2:2011cv02558
Movant:
Aquawood LLC
Plaintiff:
Aviva Sports Inc
Defendant:
Fingerhut Direct Marketing Inc, KMart Corporation, Manley Toys Inc and others
Aviva Sports Inc v. Fingerhut Direct Marketing Inc et al
as 2:2011cv01664
Plaintiff:
Aviva Sports Inc
Defendant:
Fingerhut Direct Marketing Inc, KMart Corporation, Manley Toys Inc and others
Aviva Sports, Inc. v. Finderhut Direct Marketing, Inc. et al
as 3:2010mc80249
Plaintiff:
Aviva Sports, Inc.
Defendant:
Finderhut Direct Marketing, Inc., Menard, Inc., KMART Corporation and others
3rd_party_defendant:
Brian Dubinsky , Aquawood, LLC and Wham-O, Inc.
Leviton Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Fujian Hongan Electric Co., Ltd et al
as 5:2010cv03961
Plaintiff:
Leviton Manufacturing Co., Inc.
Defendant:
Fujian Hongan Electric Co., Ltd , General Protecht Group, Inc., Shanghai Ele Manufacturing Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Leviton Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Fujian Hongan Electric Co., Ltd et al
as 3:2010cv03961
Plaintiff:
Leviton Manufacturing Co., Inc.
Defendant:
Fujian Hongan Electric Co., Ltd, General Protecht Group, Inc., Shanghai Ele Manufacturing Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Nilex Corporation v. DGI-Menard Inc et al
as 4:2009cv03723
Plaintiff:
Nilex Corporation
Defendant:
DGI-Menard Inc, Seth Pearlman, Roger Bloomfield and others
Intervenor:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
