Cases 11 - 20 of 536
Adams v. CT et al
as 2:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
Brandon Adams
Defendant:
CT, A. Zamora, R. Gador and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Adams v. CT et al
as 2:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Brandon Adams
Defendant:
CT, A. Zamora, R. Gador and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Adams v. CT et al
as 2:2024cv00216
Plaintiff:
Brandon Adams
Defendant:
CT, A. Zamora, R. Gador and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams v. CT et al
as 2:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Brandon Adams
Defendant:
CT, A. Zamora, R. Gador and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Hines v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Tony Hines
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Warden Breitenbach, Robert Suwe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kennedy v. The City of Las Vegas, Nevada et al
as 2:2023cv02138
Plaintiff:
Alea R. Kennedy
Defendant:
The City of Las Vegas, Nevada, Jerry Lee Moore, Kennedy Nicole Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller v. Trader Joe's Company
as 2:2023cv02098
Plaintiff:
Jana Miller
Defendant:
Trader Joe's Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Hendrix v. McCoy et al
as 3:2023cv00637
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Defendant:
Kimberly McCoy, Tanya Asher, J. Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller et al v. Beesley et al
as 3:2023cv00603
Plaintiff:
Robert Maynard Miller, UMI Hospitality Inc., Chaledeeannka Deborah Ann Goyens and others
Defendant:
Bruce Beesley, David Endres, Eric Fernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Colon et al v. Perry, Johnson & Associates, Inc.
as 2:2023cv01910
Plaintiff:
Byron Colon and Edward Miller, Jr.
Defendant:
Perry, Johnson & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
