Cases 11 - 20 of 50
Gonzalez v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2018cv00039
Petitioner:
Luis Miguel Gonzalez
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cristobal Gonzalez-Aguilera v. Mark Nooth
as 17-35066
Petitioner - Appellant:
CRISTOBAL MIGUEL GONZALEZ-AGUILERA
Respondent - Appellee:
MARK NOOTH
Miguel Gonzalez Juarez v. Loretta Lynch
as 16-73122
Petitioner:
MIGUEL GONZALEZ JUAREZ
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv05130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Allstate Indemnity Company as Subrogee of Miguel Gonzalez-Chavez v. Dinsdale et al
as 3:2015cv01969
Plaintiff:
Allstate Indemnity Company as Subrogee of Miguel Gonzalez-Chavez
Defendant:
Gordon Dinsdale and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gonzalez v. Williams et al
as 2:2015cv00618
Petitioner:
Hector Miguel Gonzalez
Respondent:
The Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Brian Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv01585
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
USA v. Miguel Martinez-Villareal
as 14-10121
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MIGUEL MARTINEZ-VILLAREAL, AKA Sergio Ponce De Leon, AKA Miguel Angel Gonzalez, AKA Miguel Gonzalez-Martinez, AKA Miguel Gonzalez-Villareal, AKA Miguel Martinez, AKA Mario Sanchez
Gonzalez-Aguilera v. Nooth
as 2:2014cv00325
Petitioner:
Cristobal Miguel Gonzalez-Aguilera
Respondent:
Mark Nooth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miguel Gonzalez Juarez, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-70232
Petitioner:
MIGUEL GONZALEZ JUAREZ and MARIA ESTHER ONTIVEROS RESENDIZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
