Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv01720
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Narayan Nath v. Eric Holder, Jr. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-72412
Petitioner: NARAYAN PRASAD NATH
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Barapind v Government of the Republic of India, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00667
Plaintiff: Kulvir Singh Barapind
Defendant: Government of the Republic of India, The State Government of Pubjab, The Punjab Police and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Rivera v. City of Richmond et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv05750
Plaintiff: Monica Rivera
Defendant: City of Richmond, Ritzie Tolentino and Amit Nath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bhola Adhikari, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-72019
Petitioner: BHOLA NATH ADHIKARI and MAN KUMARI ADHIKARI
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Dhirendra Sukul v. Eric Holder, Jr. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-72482
Petitioner: DHIRENDRA NATH SUKUL
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Nath vs Commissioner of Social Security We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv01441
Plaintiff: Praveena Devi Nath
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Ahbinesh Nath v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 10-71540
Petitioner: AHBINESH NATH
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Neurorepair, Inc. v. The Nath Law Group et al
as 3:2009cv00986
Plaintiff: Neurorepair, Inc.
Defendant: The Nath Law Group, Robert P. Cogan and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Nath & Associates, PLLC v. Hartford Casualty Insurance Company
as 3:2008cv01567
Plaintiff: Nath & Associates, PLLC
Defendant: Hartford Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Plaintiff

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?