Cases 11 - 16 of 16
U-Haul Co. of Nevada, Inc. et al v USA, et al.
as 2:2008cv00729
Plaintiff:
U-Haul International, Inc., U-Haul International, Inc., U-Haul Co. of Nevada, Inc. and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Nathan W Albright and Steven Wamser
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
National Account Management In, et al v. Shelly Singhal, et al
as 08-55647
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATIONAL ACCOUNT MANAGEMENT INC. and BUSINESS GROWTH FUNDING, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
SHELLY S. SINGHAL, NICOLE MARTIN, SBI BRIGHTLINE, V, LLC and others
Defendant-third-party-plaintiff - Appellee:
SBI-USA, LLC, A California Limited Liability Company
Third-party-defendant:
NATHAN W. DRAGE, an individual and ADRIAN WILSON, an individual
Drage et al v. Singhal et al
as 8:2007cv01417
Plaintiff:
Nathan W Drage and Nathan W. Drage, P.C. Trust
Defendant:
Shelly S Singhal, Nicole Martin, John Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
U-Haul International, et al v. Wilcher, et al
as 07-16482
Plaintiff - Appellant:
U-HAUL INTERNATIONAL, INC and U-HAUL COMPANY OF NEVADA,INC. ("U-HAUL")
Intervenor - Appellee:
ESTATE OF NATHAN W. ALBRIGHT
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBRA WILCHER, STEVEN WAMSER, GREGORY J KAMER LTD, doing business as Kamer Zucker & Abbott and others
Leaf Funding Inc v. Calneva Partners Inc et al
as 2:2007mc00037
Plaintiff:
Leaf Funding Inc and Leaf Funding Inc
Defendant:
Calneva Partners Inc, Joyce Ann Emory, Ryan Feier and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
National Account Management Inc et al v. Shelly S Singhal et al
as 8:2007cv00333
Plaintiff:
National Account Management Inc and Business Growth Funding Inc
Defendant:
Shelly S Singhal, Nicole Martin, SBI-USA LLC and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
Nathan W Drage, Adrian Wilson and Roes 101-125
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
SBI-USA LLC, SBI-USA LLC, SBI-USA LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
