Cases 11 - 20 of 1,351
Angela Corona et al v. State of California et al
as 5:2024cv00883
Plaintiff:
Angela Corona, Elizabeth Campbell, Elizabeth Middleton and others
Defendant:
State Of California, State of California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation, Tina Dhillon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robert Crisp v. Richard Navarro et al
as 2:2024cv02550
Plaintiff:
Robert Crisp
Defendant:
Richard Navarro and Zack King
Navarro v. Apartment Management Consultants, LLC
as 3:2024cv00856
Defendant:
Rosa Navarro and Apartment Management Consultants, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Navarro et al v. Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Grace Navarro and Chatham Mullins
Defendant:
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00968
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Orozco-Navarro v. Garland
as 24-2161
Petitioner:
ROSALIO OROZCO-NAVARRO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Navarro v. Target Corporation
as 1:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
Grace Navarro
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Oelker v. Traum et al
as 2:2024cv00355
Plaintiff:
Jeromy Oelker
Defendant:
Traum and Navarro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
JW ARAP LLC v. Eduardo Navarro et al
as 2:2024cv01197
Plaintiff:
JW ARAP LLC
Defendant:
Eduardo E. Navarro, Antonio M. Navarro, Bartola Navarro and others
Hill v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento
as 24-1583
Petitioner:
NATHAN HILL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Interested Party:
GAVIN NEWSOM, RALPH DIAZ, Director of CDCR, KEN CLARK, Warden of CSP-Corcoran and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
