Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 1,026
Pena-Cardona, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2922
Petitioner: RAFAEL PENA-CARDONA and IAN PENA-GARCIA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Oregon v. GardaWorld CashLink LLC
as 2:2024cv03862
Plaintiff: Rodrigo Pena Oregon
Defendant: GardaWorld CashLink LLC doing business as GardaWorld Cash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Angelica Maria Pena v. Martin OMalley
as 2:2024cv03730
Plaintiff: Angelica Maria Pena
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Salavador Pena v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 5:2024cv00888
Plaintiff: Salvador Pena
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
G and G Closed Circuit Events LLC v. David Pena Zamora
as 2:2024cv03177
Plaintiff: G&G Closed Circuit Events LLC
Defendant: David Pena Zamora
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
Pena v. City of Los Angeles
as 24-2422
Plaintiff: CARLOS PENA
Defendant: CITY OF LOS ANGELES
Emert v. San Diego Board of Supervisors et al
as 3:2024cv00671
Petitioner: Robert Emert
Defendant: San Diego Board of Supervisors, County of San Diego, Dawn Balerio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Tripati v. Carter, et al.
as 24-2191
Plaintiff: ANANT KUMAR TRIPATI
Defendant: PAUL EDWARD CARTER, ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL, UNKNOWN CARTER, MICHAEL EVAN GOTTFRIED and others
Pena v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 2:2024cv01074
Plaintiff: Sara Pena
Defendant: Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Dada, et al. v. NSO Group Technologies Limited, et al.
as 24-2179
Plaintiff: CARLOS DADA, SERGIO ARAUZ, GABRIELA CACERES GUTIERREZ and others
Defendant: NSO GROUP TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED and Q CYBER TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?