Cases 11 - 20 of 412
Reayes v. Madden et al
as 3:2023cv00254
Plaintiff:
Kejuan D. Reayes
Defendant:
Raymond Madden, Scott Steadman, Jason Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Blackgold v. Madden
as 3:2023cv00013
Petitioner:
Suten Blackgold
Respondent:
Raymond Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Hopper v. Madden, et al.
as 3:2022cv01909
Petitioner:
Douglas Lee Hopper
Respondent:
Brian Kibler, Raymond Madden, A. Palacios and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Madden et al
as 3:2022cv01814
Plaintiff:
Larry Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Raymond Madden, Kathleen Allison, Kristin Haas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Madden et al
as 3:2022cv01681
Plaintiff:
Rayon Jones
Defendant:
Raymond Madden and ICC Committee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Peters v. Madden
as 5:2022cv06480
Petitioner:
Darren Michael Peters
Respondent:
Raymond Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Bailey v. Madden
as 1:2022cv01273
Petitioner:
Demetris Frank Bailey, Jr.
Respondent:
Raymond Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Hopper v. Madden et al
as 2:2022cv01743
Plaintiff:
Douglas Lee Hopper
Defendant:
Raymond Madden, A. Palacios, P. Bracamonte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Madden et al
as 3:2022cv01428
Plaintiff:
Keith White
Defendant:
Raymond Madden, Frank Sharpe, J. Gallegos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Madden et al
as 3:2022cv01401
Plaintiff:
Rayvone Robinson
Defendant:
Raymond Madden, J. Gallegos, Frank Sharpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
