Cases 11 - 20 of 964
United States of America v. Yepiz
as 24-1688
Defendant:
MANUEL YEPIZ, Martin Sanchez, Seal G and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Zambrano
as 24-1690
Defendant:
FRANCISCO ZAMBRANO, Seal II and Noc
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Yepiz
as 24-1691
Defendant:
RAFAEL YEPIZ, Seal A, Sneaky and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Mejia
as 24-1700
Defendant:
SERGIO MEJIA, Seal JJ and Jaws
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Contreras
as 24-1709
Defendant:
JESUS CONTRERAS, Seal U and Yuck
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Federal Insurance Company v. Zenith Manufacturing, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00519
Plaintiff:
Federal Insurance Company
Defendant:
Zenith Manufacturing, Inc., Prism MFG, Inc., Prism Structures, Inc. and others
Cross Plaintiff:
Sphere Alliance Inc. and Flare Group
Cross Defendant:
Prism Manufacturing Insurance Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Rogers v. Sacramento County, et al.
as 24-559
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIM EDWARD ROGERS
Defendant / Appellee:
SACRAMENTO COUNTY, Board of Supervisors, CITY OF SACRAMENTO, City Clerk, JIM COOPER, Sacramento Sheriff and others
Rogers v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento
as 24-512
Petitioner:
KIM EDWARD ROGERS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Not Classified By Court:
SACRAMENTO COUNTY, Board of Supervisors, CITY OF SACRAMENTO, City Clerk, JIM COOPER, Sacramento Sheriff and others
Hill et al v. Pacific Maritime Association et al
as 3:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
Pamela Hill, JERI STEWART, Rhonda Johnson and others
Defendant:
APM Terminals North America, Inc., APM TERMINALS PACIFIC, LLC, Maersk A/S and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
