Cases 11 - 20 of 55
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02553
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dermond Peterson Design LLC v. JLA Home Inc et al
as 2:2014cv06300
Defendant:
Amazon, Inc, Bed Bath & Beyond Inc, Belk Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Dermond Peterson Design LLC
G.P, et al v. Sears Roebuck and Co. et al
as 5:2014cv01256
Defendant:
Does, Husqvarna Professional Products Inc and Sears, Roebuck & Co
Plaintiff:
G. P.
Jason Brown v. HireRight, Inc. et al
as 8:2014cv00952
Plaintiff:
Jason Brown
Defendant:
HireRight, Inc. and Sears Roebuck & Co.
Masters et al v. Sears Roebuck & Co et al
as 5:2013cv02253
Defendant:
A&E Factory Service, Sears Roebuck & Co and Whirlpool
Plaintiff:
Debbie Masters and Jeremy Masters
Santillan Padilla et al v. Black Company, Sears, Roebuck & CO, et al
as 3:2013mc00128
Defendant:
Black Company, Sears, Roebuck & CO, et al
Interested Non-Party:
Stephen F. Gass, SD3, LLC and SawStop LLC
Plaintiff:
Karla Santillan and Edgar Jesus Santillan Padilla
e.Digital Corporation v. Osram Sylvania, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv02891
Plaintiff:
e.Digital Corporation
Defendant:
Osram Sylvania, Inc., Buy.Com, Inc., Hastings Internet, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Liptak v. Ally Bank et al
as 2:2012cv00882
Defendant:
Ally Bank, Bank Of America, IRS/United States and others
Plaintiff:
V.F. Liptak
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731 Fraud
Galvan v. Sears Holdings Management Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv00702
Plaintiff:
Lizette Galvan
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck & Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Country Mutual Insurance Company v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc. et al
as 6:2012cv00646
Plaintiff:
Country Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Electrolux Home Products, Inc. and Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
