Cases 11 - 20 of 202
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv06859
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Eve Doe v. Quinn Emanuel Urquhart and Sullivan LLP et al
as 2:2023cv04896
Plaintiff:
Eve Doe
Defendant:
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart and Sullivan LLP, John Quinn, Diane Doolittle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00828
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Sharlene Shu, et al v. Toyota Motor Sales USA, Inc., et al
as 23-15717
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SHARLENE SHU, MARK TENGOWSKI, ROMAN SIVION and others
Defendant / Appellant:
TOYOTA MOTOR SALES USA, INC. and TOYOTA MOTOR NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00785
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Daniel Cobb v. Catricia Howard, et al
as 23-15567
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL COBB
Defendant / Appellee:
CATRICIA HOWARD, Complex warden at USP-Tucson, K WERNER, SOMP Coordinator/ Psychologist at USP-Tucson, L UNRUH-PARKER, SOMP Psychologist at USP-Tucson and others
(PC) Chinsami v. Cueva
as 2:2023cv00567
Plaintiff:
Shu Chinsami
Defendant:
Daniel Cueva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shu Zhen Ni v. Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd. et al
as 2:2023cv02115
Plaintiff:
Shuzhen Ni and Shu Zhen Ni
Defendant:
Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd. and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01261
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
(PC) Chinsami v. Seabrooks
as 2:2023cv00148
Plaintiff:
Shu Chinsami
Defendant:
Seabrooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
