Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Steven McDonald v. James Edwards, et al
as 14-35823
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN DARBY MCDONALD
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES EDWARDS, M.D., Medical Director, WSP, F. JOHN SMITH, M.D., Physician, WSP, G. PIERCE, Disciplinary Hearings Examiner, WSP and others
Steven McDonald v. MD John Kenney, et al
as 14-35068
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN DARBY MCDONALD
Defendant - Appellee:
MD JOHN DAVID KENNEY, Medical Director, Washington State Dept of Corrections, in his individual and official capacity and MD G. STEVEN HAMMOND, Medical Director, Washington State Dept of Corrections, in his individual and official capacity
Steven McDonald v. James Edwards, et al
as 13-35732
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN DARBY MCDONALD
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES EDWARDS, M.D., Medical Director, WSP, F. JOHN SMITH, M.D., Physician, WSP, G. PIERCE, Disciplinary Hearings Examiner, WSP and others
McDonald v. Kenney et al
as 3:2013cv05647
Plaintiff:
Steven Darby McDonald
Defendant:
John David Kenney and G Steven Hammond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald v. Edwards et al
as 2:2013cv00222
Plaintiff:
Steven Darby McDonald
Defendant:
James Edwards, F John Smith, G Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald v. Edwards et al
as 2:2013cv05034
Plaintiff:
Steven Darby McDonald
Defendant:
James Edwards, F John Smith, G Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steven McDonald v. USDCSEA
as 10-71217
:
In re: STEVEN DARBY MCDONALD
Petitioner:
STEVEN DARBY MCDONALD
Respondent:
USDC, SEATTLE
Real Party In Interest:
DOUGLAS WADDINGTON
Steven McDonald v. Doug Waddington
as 09-35239
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEVEN DARBY MCDONALD
Respondent - Appellee:
DOUG WADDINGTON, Superintendent
McDonald v. Waddington
as 2:2007cv00135
Petitioner:
Steven Darby McDonald
Respondent:
Douglas Waddington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
