Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Craig Dawson v. State of Oregon
as 11-71449
Petitioner: CRAIG THOMAS DAWSON
Respondent: STATE OF OREGON
Dawson et al v. Finn et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv01473
Defendant: Ms. Clemente, Finn, Jeff Premo and others
Plaintiff: Craig Thomas Dawson and Susan Dawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2010cv01188
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dawson v. Draves et al
as 3:2010cv01143
Plaintiff: Craig Thomas Dawson
Defendant: Donald Draves, Ms. Gitnes, J. Kamins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Craig Dawson v. Oregon State Board of Parole &
as 10-35070
Petitioner - Appellant: CRAIG THOMAS DAWSON
Respondent - Appellee: OREGON STATE BOARD OF PAROLE & POST-PRISON SUPERVISION
Craig Dawson v. State of Oregon, et al
as 09-36101
Petitioner - Appellant: CRAIG THOMAS DAWSON
Respondent - Appellee: STATE OF OREGON, DOUG HARCELROD and MARY ANN BEARDEN
Dawson v. Oregon State Board of Parole and Post-Prision Supervision
as 3:2009cv01218
Petitioner: Craig Thomas Dawson
Respondent: Oregon State Board of Parole and Post-Prision Supervision
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dawson v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2009cv01198
Petitioner: Craig Thomas Dawson
Respondent: State of Oregon, Doug Harcelrod and Mary Ann Bearden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dawson v. Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision et al
as 3:2009cv01142
Petitioner: Craig Thomas Dawson
Respondent: Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision and John Kroger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?