Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 16 of 16
Vandorssen v. United Healthcare Inc et al
as 2:2009cv01727
Plaintiff: Robert Vandorssen and Robert Vandorssen
Defendant: United Healthcare Inc and King County Public Hospital District No.1
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Type: Contract None
Jensen v. United Healthcare, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00879
Plaintiff: Sage Jensen and Sage Jensen
Defendant: United Healthcare, Inc., The URS Definity Consumer Directed Health Reimbursement Account Plan and The NSNG Management LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Type: Labor None
Conway v. United Healthcare Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv02941
Plaintiff: Kenneth Conway, Kenneth Conway and Mark R. Martinez
Defendant: United Healthcare Inc., United Healthcare Inc., Plan-It Interactive and others
Cross-claimant: Plan-It Interactive
Cross-defendant: Martinez & Associates and Mark R. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Type: Labor Plaintiff
Davita Inc et al v. United Healthcare Insurance Company et al
as 8:2009cv00523
Plaintiff: Davita Inc, DVA Renal Healthcare and Total Renal Care Inc
Defendant: United Healthcare Insurance Company, United Healthcare Inc, United Healthcare Services Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing L.P. v. Avon Products Inc et al
as 2:2007cv03672
Plaintiff: Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing L.P., Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing L.P., Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing L.P. and others
Defendant: Avon Products Inc, First Premier Bank, Premier Bankcard LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Watkins v. United Healthcare Inc
as 2:2007cv00678
Plaintiff: William E Watkins
Defendant: United Healthcare Inc and United Healthcare Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?