Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Mary Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, et al
as 09-17710
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellant:
MARY ANGELA CAFASSO, United States, ex rel.
Defendant - Appellee:
GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellee:
GENERAL DYNAMICS C4 SYSTEMS, INC.
Movant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Shelton et al v. United States Ex rel et al
as 6:2009cv00059
Plaintiff:
JoAnn Shelton and Pamela Arroues
Defendant:
United States Ex rel and United States Department of Transportation/FAA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Mary Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, I
as 09-16607
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARY ANGELA CAFASSO, United States ex rel.
Defendant - Appellee:
GENERAL DYNAMICS C4 SYSTEMS, INC.
Movant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Isbell v. United States, ex rel United States Department of Transportation/FAA
as 6:2009cv00045
Plaintiff:
Jason Isbell
Defendant:
United States, ex rel United States Department of Transportation/FAA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Mary Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, I
as 09-16181
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellant:
MARY ANGELA CAFASSO, United States ex rel.
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellee:
GENERAL DYNAMICS C4 SYSTEMS, INC.
Maxxam, Inc., et al v. USDC-CAO
as 09-71019
:
In re: MAXXAM, INC. and CHARLES E. HURWITZ
Petitioner:
MAXXAM, INC. and CHARLES E. HURWITZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Real Party In Interest:
UNITED STATES EX REL., RICHARD WILSON and CHRIS MARANTO
United States, ex rel. et al v. Hebrard et al
as 3:2008cv03411
Plaintiff:
United States, ex rel. and Bonnie Lammers
Defendant:
Michael Hebrard, Richard Lavigna, Farideh Heidarpour and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
United States, ex rel. Under Seal v. Under Seal
as 5:2008cv02020
Plaintiff:
United States, ex rel. Under Seal
Defendant:
Under Seal
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
