Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Turner v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2017cv01737
Plaintiff:
Steven Deon Turner, Jr.
Defendant:
William J. Sullivan, J. Busby, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vester Patterson v. William Sullivan
as 17-73297
Petitioner:
VESTER L. PATTERSON
Respondent:
WILLIAM J. SULLIVAN
Ronald Martinez v. Kathleen Allison, et al
as 14-16880
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD F. MARTINEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN ALLISON, Warden, Warden Acting at California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility (CSATF), KENT CLARK, Warden of California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility (CSATF), WILLIAM J. SULLIVAN, Associate Director of General Population (Sacramento) and others
Lopez v. Allison et al
as 1:2013cv02010
Plaintiff:
Adam Lopez
Defendant:
K. Allison, Kent Clark, William J. Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
De Leon v. Allison et al
as 1:2013cv00257
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Kent Clark, William J. Sullivan and others
Plaintiff:
Jesus De Leon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Allison et al
as 1:2011cv00293
Plaintiff:
Ronald F. Martinez
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Kent Clark, William J. Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eddie Harris v. William Sullivan
as 10-55652
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDDIE HARRIS
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM J. SULLIVAN
Pedro Alonso Gonzales v. Robert Ayres et al
as 2:2010cv02903
Defendant:
Robert Ayres, PHD Echendu, PHD Echendu and others
Plaintiff:
Pedro Alonso Gonzales
Thomas Lee Bell v. William J. Sullivan
as 2:2009cv05870
Petitioner:
Thomas Lee Bell
Respondent:
William J. Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edward Throop v. Jeanne Woodford, et al
as 09-56068
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD ANTHONY THROOP
Defendant - Appellee:
JEANNE S. WOODFORD, Director CDCR, STUART RYAN, Former Warden, GEORGE GIURBINO, Former Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
