Cases 11 - 20 of 210
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01934
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Woods v. Breitenbach et al
as 3:2023cv00635
Plaintiff:
Jacob Wood and Jacob Woods
Defendant:
Warden Breitenbach, Omler, Nurse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zuniga v. Hartman et al
as 3:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Zuniga
Defendant:
Hartman, Eric Wood, Willhite and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Henly et al
as 3:2023cv00549
Plaintiff:
Jamelle L. Russell
Defendant:
Henly, Justin Zysman, Jeffery Holz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schulze et al v. Douglas County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2023cv00567
Plaintiff:
Sandra Schulze, Makayla Schulze, Gahvin Schulze and others
Defendant:
Douglas County Sheriff's Office and Matt Sampson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woods v. LeGrand et al
as 3:2023cv00560
Plaintiff:
Andre L. Woods
Defendant:
Kara LeGrand, Erin Parks, Desiree Hultenschmidt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood-Jimenez v. Department of Motor Vehicles Nevada
as 2:2023cv01359
Petitioner:
Reina Tea Wood-Jimenez
Respondent:
Department of Motor Vehicles Nevada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rowe v. Judge Cristy Criag et al
as 2:2023cv01679
Plaintiff:
Michael Rowe
Defendant:
Judge Cristy Criag, Judge Natali Woods, Judge Jeannie Hua and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America et al v. Robert C. Wood II et al
as 2:2023cv00999
Plaintiff:
United States of America, State of California, Ted Switzer and others
Defendant:
Robert C. Wood, II, Access Medical, LLC, APSW, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
