Cases 21 - 30 of 4,587
Melara Villalta et al v. Federal Bureau of Investigations et al
as 4:2024cv05078
Plaintiff:
Miguel Angel Melara Villalta and Delio Diaz
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigations and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Flournoy v. Pollard, et al.
as 24-4953
Defendant:
RALPH DIAZ, Former CDCR Secretary, M. POLLARD, Warden, Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility, KILOUGH and others
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN FLOURNOY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06766
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Diaz et al v. Moderna US Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00986
Plaintiff:
Wayne Diaz and Donna Noto Diaz
Defendant:
Moderna US Inc and Does 1-8
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06726
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lucero Quintana et al v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv05641
Plaintiff:
Roberto Zepeda, Lucero Quintana, Saul Enriquez and others
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Centers, LLC and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Pacheco Diaz, et al. v. Garland
as 24-4759
Petitioner:
CARLOS ALFREDO PACHECO DIAZ, ARIANA VALERIA PACHECO LINARES and BEATRIZ DEL CARMEN LINARES DE PACHECO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Diaz-Borja, et al. v. Garland
as 24-4782
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
PAULA ISABELLA GALLARDO-DIAZ, YEANERTH NATALY DIAZ-BORJA, DULCE SHARICK GALLARDO-DIAZ and others
Diaz v. Polaris Industries, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01087
Defendant:
Polaris Industries, Inc. and Does 1 through 10
Plaintiff:
Concepcion Diaz
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2310 (c) Consumer Product Warranties
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
