Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 33
George Hicks v. Freddrick Haw
as 10-56744
Petitioner - Appellant: GEORGE EDWARD HICKS
Respondent - Appellee: FREDDRICK HAWS
Kastel v. Astrue We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv05609
Plaintiff: George Edward Kastel
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
George Edward Ford II v. Domingo Uribe Jr. et al
as 2:2010cv03191
Respondent: Gerry Brown and Domingo Uribe, Jr.
Petitioner: George Edward Ford, II
Ford v. Uribe et al
as 3:2010cv00808
Petitioner: George Edward Ford, II
Respondent: Domingo Uribe, Jr. and Gerry Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
George Edward Hicks v. Freddrick Haws We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv02051
Petitioner: George Edward Hicks
Respondent: Freddrick Haws
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Francis v. Cate et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00405
Petitioner: George Edward Francis
Respondent: Matthew Cate, Matthew Martel and Edmond G. Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
George Edward Ford v. Kenneth Clark We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00725
Petitioner: George Edward Ford
Respondent: Kenneth Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coles v. Sisto We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv02134
Petitioner: George Edward Coles
Respondent: D. Sisto
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
George Edward Hicks v. Stacy et al
as 2:2008cv00744
Petitioner: George Edward Hicks
Respondent: Stacy, Doe I, Doe II and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
George Edward Hicks v. Stacy et al
as 2:2007cv07031
Plaintiff: George Edward Hicks
Defendant: Stacy, John Doe I, John Doe II and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?