Cases 21 - 30 of 50
Christopher Corcoran, et al v. CVS Health Corporation, et al
as 17-16996
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER CORCORAN, ZULEMA AVIS, DEBBIE BARRETT and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CVS HEALTH CORPORATION and CVS PHARMACY, INC.
Northwest Administrators Inc v. Chris Jenks Trucking, LLC
as 2:2017cv00881
Plaintiff:
Northwest Administrators Inc
Defendant:
Chris Jenks Trucking, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00554
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenks et al v. PHH Mortgage Corporation et al
as 5:2015cv05361
Plaintiff:
Margo Felix Jenks and Michael Jenks
Defendant:
PHH Mortgage Corporation and Barrett Daffin Frappier Treder & Weiss LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Corcoran et al v. CVS Health Corporation
as 4:2015cv03504
Plaintiff:
Carl Washington, Carolyn Caine, Stephen Sullivan and others
Defendant:
CVS Health and CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
M. Todd Jenks v. DLA Piper LLP (US) et al
as 3:2015cv00254
Plaintiff:
M. Todd Jenks
Defendant:
DLA Piper LLP (US) and DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary US LLP Plan # 525
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Michael Jenks v. DLA Piper (US) LLP
as 14-16537
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL TODD JENKS
Respondent - Appellee:
DLA PIPER (US) LLP
Jenks v. Colvin
as 3:2014cv05481
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Monique D Jenks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Jenks v. DLA PIPER US LLP
as 3:2013cv05381
Respondent:
DLA Piper (US) LLP
Petitioner:
Michael Todd Jenks
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
Jenks v. Rainier Surgical Inc et al
as 2:2013cv01185
Plaintiff:
Laurie Jenks
Defendant:
Rainier Surgical Inc, Plan Administrator of the Rainier Surgical Inc Disability Plan, Rainier Surgical Inc Disability Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
