Cases 21 - 30 of 261
(PC) Petillo v. Lynch et al
as 2:2024cv00421
Plaintiff:
Dennis Petillo, Jr.
Defendant:
Jeff Lynch, Endy, Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Iseli v. State of California et al
as 3:2024cv00523
Plaintiff:
Branden Willie Iseli
Defendant:
State of California, County of San Joaquin, United States District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC)Zamora v. Lynch
as 1:2024cv00040
Petitioner:
Santiago Manuel Zamora
Respondent:
Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Modest v. Lynch
as 3:2023cv06631
Petitioner:
Scott Ryan Modest
Respondent:
Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Pangborn v. Strong et al
as 2:2023cv02976
Plaintiff:
David James Pangborn
Defendant:
Strong, Andrichuk, Jian Ma and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
(PC) Modest v. Lynch
as 2:2023cv02980
Plaintiff:
Scott Ryan Modest
Defendant:
Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Hammler v. Grubbs et al
as 2:2023cv02770
Plaintiff:
Allen Hammler
Defendant:
Demitrious Grubbs, Jeff Lynch and Secretary of CDCR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Clark v. Macomber et al
as 2:2023cv03051
Plaintiff:
Steven Clark
Defendant:
Jeffrey Macomber, Jeff Lynch, Joseph T. Zeiter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Hilson v. Lynch et al
as 1:2023cv01757
Plaintiff:
Rasheed Hilson, Sr.
Defendant:
Jeff Lynch, O. Dingle, Cammagay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Young v. Ehlers et al
as 2:2023cv02558
Plaintiff:
Zuri Sanakabisa Young
Defendant:
Ryan Ehlers, Edillberto Rangel, Jose Quezada and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
