Cases 21 - 30 of 231
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-17014
Petitioner - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00225
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00469
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
City and County of San Francis v. Donald Trump, et al
as 17-16886
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Defendant - Appellant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States, JOHN F. KELLY, Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Attorney General of the United States and others
County of Santa Clara v. Donald Trump, et al
as 17-16887
Plaintiff - Appellee:
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
Defendant - Appellant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States, JOHN F. KELLY, Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Attorney General of the United States and others
Xiaoyan Quan v. John F. Kelly et al
as 2:2017cv06731
Defendant:
John F. Kelly, James McCament and Jerry Neinauer
Plaintiff:
Xiaoyan Quan
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00767
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00956
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Cipriano Mendez-Contreras v. John F. Kelly et al
as 2:2017cv06435
Respondent:
John F. Kelly and Jefferson Sessions
Petitioner:
Cipriano Mendez-Contreras
Cipriano Mendez-Contreras v. John F. Kelly et al
as 5:2017cv01780
Respondent:
John F. Kelly and Jefferson Sessions
Petitioner:
Cipriano Mendez-Contreras
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
