Cases 21 - 30 of 47
Sheldon Lockett et al v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 2:2018cv05838
Defendant:
Mizrain Orrego, Sheriff Jim McDonnell, Samuel Aldama and others
Plaintiff:
Michelle Davis, Clyde Davis and Sheldon Lockett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
F and W Thunderbird v. Steve M Lockett et al
as 2:2018cv01976
Defendant:
Doe, Erin Lockett and Steve M Lockett
Plaintiff:
F and W Thunderbird
Melvin D. Lockett v. Richard B. Ives
as 2:2014cv07441
Respondent:
Richard B. Ives
Petitioner:
Melvin D. Lockett
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01887
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tyrone Acosta et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2014cv05641
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Acosta, Miguel Aguayo, Robert Aguilar and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and Does
Petitioner:
Christopher Patterson
Melvin D. Lockett v. Richard B. Ives
as 2:2014cv05366
Respondent:
Richard B. Ives
Petitioner:
Melvin D. Lockett
Clara Bagdasarian et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv01863
Plaintiff:
Clara Bagdasarian, Margaruita Evans, Margaret Gilbert and others
Defendant:
Does, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer, Inc.
Lockett et al v. AO Smith Corporation et al
as 3:2014cv00379
Defendant:
Air and Liquid Systems Corporation, Burnham LLC, CBS Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Charles P. Lockett and Dori Lockett
Intervenor:
Hartford Fire Insurance Company, West American Insurance Company, Safeco Insurance Company of America and others
Cross Defendant:
Genuine Parts Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Floyd Lockett v. Daniel Paramo et al
as 2:2013cv05842
Respondent:
K Harris and Daniel Paramo
Petitioner:
Floyd Lockett
Lockett v. Paramo et al
as 3:2013cv01761
Petitioner:
Floyd Lockett
Respondent:
Daniel Paramo and K. Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
