Cases 21 - 30 of 60
Poslof v. Martel et al
as 2:2018cv00587
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Lee Poslof, Jr.
Defendant:
Michael Martel and California Dept. Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Poslof v. Deuel Vocational Institution et al
as 2:2017cv02422
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Lee Poslof, Sr.
Defendant:
Deuel Vocational Institution, Sable and G. Malet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lonnie Banark v. Adams, et al
as 17-17085
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LONNIE LEE BANARK
Defendant - Appellee:
ADAMS, Assistant Warden of Operations, AARON BROWN, Investigator, B. CLARK, Registered Nurse and others
Poslof v. Warnke
as 1:2017cv01119
Petitioner:
Lonnie Lee Poslof, Jr.
Respondent:
Vern Warnke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lonnie Banark v. Adams, et al
as 17-15674
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LONNIE LEE BANARK
Defendant - Appellee:
ADAMS, Assistant Warden of Operations, AARON BROWN, Investigator, B. CLARK, Registered Nurse and others
Lonnie Banark v. Adams, et al
as 17-15006
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LONNIE LEE BANARK
Defendant - Appellee:
ADAMS, Assistant Warden of Operations, AARON BROWN, Investigator, B. CLARK, Registered Nurse and others
Banark v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2016cv02555
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Lee Banark
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, R. Hannah, Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Lonnie Banark v. Adams, et al
as 16-16793
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LONNIE LEE BANARK
Defendant - Appellee:
ADAMS, Assistant Warden of Operations, AARON BROWN, Investigator, B. CLARK, Registered Nurse and others
Banark v. Adams et al
as 2:2016cv01948
Respondent:
Warden Adams and Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Petitioner:
Lonnie Lee Banark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lonnie Banark v. Adams, et al
as 16-16397
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LONNIE LEE BANARK
Defendant - Appellee:
ADAMS, AARON BROWN, Investigator, B. CLARK, Registered Nurse and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
