Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
In re: Howard Thruston
as 13-60010
Debtor:
In re: HOWARD FLETCHER THRUSTON
Appellant:
HOWARD FLETCHER THRUSTON
Appellee:
DAVID M. REAVES, Trustee and NATIONAL BANK OF ARIZONA
In re: Weston Ranch Development, L.L., et al v. Compass Bank, et al
as 12-17715
Debtor:
In the Matter of: WESTON RANCH DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C.
Appellant:
WESTON RANCH DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C.
Appellee:
COMPASS BANK, DAVID M. REAVES, U.S. BANK NA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01416
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01267
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00537
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00514
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
David M Reaves v. Mary Beth Broughman et al
as 2:2011mc00538
Defendant:
Belmont Shore Rugby Club, John Doe Broughman, John Doe Broughman and others
In Re Debtor:
Alva James Bennett and Deborah Cheryl Bennett
Plaintiff:
David M Reaves
Thomas Junghans, et al v. The 12 Percent Fund I, LLC, et al
as 11-17741
Appellant:
THOMAS G. JUNGHANS and RODERICK MCBROOM
Appellee:
THE 12 PERCENT FUND I, LLC, Debtor, DAVID M. REAVES and COYOTE GROWTH MANAGEMENT LLC, Debtor
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01937
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
