Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 10,755
Heather Featherstone v. Martin O Malley
as 5:2024cv01272
Plaintiff: Heather Featherstone
Defendant: Martin O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lee et al v. Byrnes Special Works, LLC
as 3:2024cv03629
Plaintiff: Martin Eng Lee and Pioneer 74 Lots, LLC
Defendant: Byrnes Special Works, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
LEE v. YAN et al
as 3:2024cv03628
Plaintiff: Martin Eng Lee
Defendant: DEMAS YAN, CHEUK YAN, LEGAL RECOVERY LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731 Fraud
Gamboa v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv05058
Plaintiff: Jaqueline Gamboa
Defendant: Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Newman v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv05035
Plaintiff: Kayla Mirae Newman
Defendant: Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Elliot v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv05059
Plaintiff: Samuel Lee Elliot
Defendant: Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Reese v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv01110
Plaintiff: Scott Reese
Defendant: Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Stark v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00201
Plaintiff: Joseph Stark
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Mor v. O'Malley We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv01107
Plaintiff: Mia Love Mor
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Cervantes v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv01032
Plaintiff: Jacqueline Cervantes
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision (regarding payment of benefits)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?