Cases 21 - 30 of 412
(PC) Jones v. Madden et al
as 2:2022cv01592
Plaintiff:
Rayon Jones
Defendant:
Raymond Madden and C. Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mario Roderick Stevens v. Raymond Madden
as 2:2022cv06138
Petitioner:
Mario Roderick Stevens
Respondent:
Raymond Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Raul Alcala v. Raymond Madden
as 5:2022cv01240
Petitioner:
Raul Alcala
Respondent:
Raymond Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Madden
as 3:2022cv00951
Petitioner:
Kelly Beau Davis
Respondent:
Raymond Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blackgold v. Madden et al
as 3:2022cv00915
Plaintiff:
Suten Blackgold
Defendant:
Raymond Madden, Mario Alonzo, D. Dominguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Latham v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2022cv00842
Plaintiff:
Joshua Latham
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Connie Gipson, Raymond Madden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cv Removal- Civil Rights Act
Anthony Morrison v. Raymond Madden
as 5:2022cv00925
Petitioner:
Anthony Morrison
Respondent:
Raymond Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arzuray D. Reed v. Raymond Madden
as 2:2022cv03693
Petitioner:
Arzuray D. Reed
Respondent:
Raymond Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Slade v. Madden
as 2:2022cv00843
Petitioner:
Barry Slade
Respondent:
Raymond Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bryson v. Madden et al
as 3:2022cv00556
Petitioner:
Ronald Bryson
Respondent:
Raymond Madden and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
