Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Regal Cinemas, Inc. v. Shops at Summerlin North, LP et al
as 2:2016at01459
Plaintiff:
Regal Cinemas, Inc.
Defendant:
Shops at Summerlin North, LP, Elk Grove Town Center, LP and Howard Hughes Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Regal Cinemas, Inc. v. Shops at Summerlin North, LP et al
as 2:2016at01460
Plaintiff:
Regal Cinemas, Inc.
Defendant:
Shops at Summerlin North, LP , Elk Grove Town Center, L.P. and Howard Hughes Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Regal Cinemas, Inc. v. Shops at Summerlin North, LP et al
as 2:2016cv02854
Plaintiff:
Regal Cinemas, Inc.
Defendant:
Shops at Summerlin North, LP , Elk Grove Town Center, L.P. and The Howard Hughes Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kelley Mazzei et al v. Regal Entertainment Group et al
as 8:2013cv01284
Respondent:
Edwards Theatres, Inc., Regal Cinemas Inc, Regal Entertainment Group and others
Petitioner:
Kelley Mazzei and Martin Orejel
Mazzei et al v. Regal Entertainment Group et al
as 3:2013cv02867
Plaintiff:
Kelley Mazzei and Martin Orejel
Defendant:
Regal Entertainment Group , Regal Cinemas, Inc. , Edwards Theatres, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01942
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02742
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012at01453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
