Cases 21 - 30 of 54
Wayne Evans v. Allied Collections Services Inc et al
as 2:2017cv04491
Defendant:
Allied Collections Services Inc, Does and Sprint Corporation
Plaintiff:
Wayne T Evans
Scott v. Sprint Corporation, et al.,
as 3:2017cv02846
Defendant:
Credico (USA) LLC , Sprint Corporation , Sprint/United Management Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Tashian Scott
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Samuel Rubio v. Sprint Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv02231
Defendant:
DOES, Sprint Corporation and Sprint United Management Co.
Plaintiff:
Samuel Rubio
Ring Plus, Inc. v. Sprint Spectrum L.P. et al
as 2:2017cv00835
Plaintiff:
Ring Plus, Inc.
Defendant:
Sprint Corporation and Sprint Spectrum L.P.
Kamau Davis v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 16-56513
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAMAU A. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Municipal Defendant, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Municipal Defendant, CITY OF LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT, Municipal Defendant and others
Bekkerman, et al v. California Board of Equalization, et al
as 2:2016cv00709
Plaintiff:
Alina Bekkerman , Brandon Griffith and Charles Lisser
Defendant:
California Board of Equalization , State of California , AT&T, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bekkerman et al v. California Board of Equalization et al
as 1:2016at00251
Plaintiff:
Alina Bekkerman, Brandon Griffith and Charles Lisser
Defendant:
California Board of Equalization, State of California, AT&T, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00936
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
William V.R. Smith v. Sprint Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv02485
Defendant:
Does and Sprint Corporation
Plaintiff:
William V R Smith
Kamau A Davis v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2015cv00313
Defendant:
Any Additional Unknown Individual Municipal and Corporate Defendants to be determined, Jim Bates, City of Los Angeles and others
Plaintiff:
Kamau A. Davis
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
