Cases 21 - 30 of 65
Arocha v. CDCR et al
as 3:2023cv01733
Plaintiff:
Rudy Arocha
Defendant:
CDCR, Associate Warden Trent Allen and Bates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amezquita v. Allen
as 23-255
Petitioner:
JOSE GUADALUPE AMEZQUITA
Respondent:
TRENT ALLEN, ACTING WARDEN
Johnson v. Allen et al
as 1:2023cv01374
Petitioner:
Christopher Vanning Johnson
Respondent:
Acting Warden Trent Allen and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Correy Mitchell v. Trent Allen
as 2:2023cv03241
Petitioner:
Correy Mitchell
Respondent:
Trent Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marsh v. Allen et al
as 2:2023at00437
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Paul Marsh
Respondent:
Trent Allen and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC)Foreman v. Allen
as 1:2023cv00390
Petitioner:
Prentice Foreman
Respondent:
Trent Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kenneth Godoy v. Trent Allen, et al
as 23-15589
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH GODOY
Defendant / Appellee:
TRENT ALLEN, Associate Warden; Warden, LOPEZ, C.O., VASQUEZ, C.O. and others
Van Buren v. Dennison et al
as 5:2023cv01272
Plaintiff:
Irvin Van Buren
Defendant:
Paul Dennison, Allison MacBeth, S. Gee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Garcia v. Allen et al
as 2:2023cv00744
Petitioner:
Juan Manuel Garcia
Respondent:
Trent Allen and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. Allen et al
as 2:2023at00371
Petitioner:
Juan Manuel Garcia
Respondent:
Warden Trent Allen and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
