Cases 21 - 30 of 59
The Estate of Alana Kerr et al v. Southern California Regional Rail Authority et al
as 5:2013cv01855
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company, City of Riverside, Connex Railroad LLC and others
Plaintiff:
David Kerr, Jennifer Kerr and The Estate of Alana Kerr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv06989
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alvaco, Inc. v. Veolia Transportation Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv05159
Plaintiff:
Alvaco, Inc.
Defendant:
Does and Veolia Transportation Services, Inc.
Faison et al v. Friendly Transportation, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv02646
Plaintiff:
Thina Faison, Ernest Strange, Jr., Edith Johnson and others
Defendant:
Friendly Transportation, Inc. , Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 192 and Veolia Transportation Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
NLRB v. Veolia Transportation Service
as 13-71571
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
VEOLIA TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01381
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jose Valdez v. Veolia Transportation Services Inc et al
as 2:2013cv01231
Defendant:
Sergio Doe, Does, Paul Tucker and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Valdez
Williams v. Supershuttle International, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv06493
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams , Timothy Sheard , Tyrone A. Plunkett and others
Defendant:
Supershuttle International, Inc., Compass Transportation, Inc. and Veolia Transportation Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv02536
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Danielle Goodwin v. Veolia Transportation Services Inc et al
as 2:2012cv08094
Defendant:
Does, Martin Tompkins and Veolia Transportation Services Inc
Plaintiff:
Danielle Goodwin
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
