Cases 21 - 30 of 415
Alva v. Lew Lewisburg USP et al
as 2:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
James Scott Alva
Defendant:
Lew Lewisburg USP, Ber Berlin FCI, N Cairns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Hogue v. Davis et al
as 3:2023cv00652
Plaintiff:
Habib Hogue
Defendant:
Scott Davis, Kara LaGrand, D. Southworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bolden v. Davis et al
as 3:2023cv00651
Plaintiff:
Tyler Bolden
Defendant:
Scott Davis, Kara LaGrand, D. Southworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendrix v. McCoy et al
as 3:2023cv00637
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Defendant:
Kimberly McCoy, Tanya Asher, J. Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendrix v. Nejara et al
as 3:2023cv00627
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Defendant:
Garbriela Nejara, Karissa Currier, Charles Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Perry Johnson & Associates, Inc.
as 2:2023cv01932
Plaintiff:
Camille Davis
Defendant:
Perry Johnson & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hardiman v. Davis et al
as 3:2023cv00584
Plaintiff:
Andre Hardiman
Defendant:
Scott Davis, Kara LaGrand, Mr. Southworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Warden Willian Gittere
as 2:2023cv01732
Petitioner:
Davis A Terrance and Terrance Davis
Respondent:
Warden Willian Gittere and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Doyle v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2023cv00514
Plaintiff:
Antonio L. Doyle
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, William Gittere, Christopher Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Kington et al
as 3:2023cv00500
Plaintiff:
Terrance Davis
Defendant:
Nurse Kington and Dr. Exum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
