Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 2,049
Fareportal, Inc. v. Kumar, et al.
as 24-4523
Defendant: NISHITH KUMAR, LEI SHI, JASON CHEN and others
Plaintiff: FAREPORTAL, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06069
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01509
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05953
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05884
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Austin v. Kia Corporation et al
as 3:2024cv04188
Defendant: Kia Corporation doing business as Kia America, Inc., EPIQ DBA, Edward J. Davilla and others
Plaintiff: George Jarvis Austin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Austin v. Kemper Corp. et al
as 3:2024cv04183
Defendant: Kemper Corp., Kevork Artinian, Ricardo Lara and others
Plaintiff: George Jarvis Austin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Austin v. ABC Legal Services, LLC
as 3:2024cv04185
Plaintiff: George Jarvis Austin
Defendant: ABC Legal Services, LLC, Yvonne Gonzales Rogers, Saundra Brown Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01442
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05796
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?