Cases 31 - 40 of 296
(PC) Torres v. Quick et al
as 1:2022cv01536
Plaintiff:
Edward Torres
Defendant:
Jayson Quick, Manuel Perez Garza, Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cornel Jackson v. County of Madera, et al
as 22-16920
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CORNEL JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF MADERA, a Municipality of the State of California, BRETT FRAZIER, DAVID ROGERS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01596
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022at00979
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Quick v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv00383
Plaintiff:
Berton H. Quick
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01599
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dale Nichols et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04982
Plaintiff:
Bob Williams, Dale Nichols, Kelly Nichols and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Craftshack, Inc. v. Quick Stop Market and Liquor et al
as 2:2022cv04086
Plaintiff:
Craftshack, Inc.
Defendant:
Quick Stop Market & Liquor, Promenade Group, Inc., DOES 1 through 10 and others
Cross Claimant:
Aster Enterprises, LLC doing business as Quick Stop Market and Liquor
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
(PC) Ramirez v. Mendoza et al
as 1:2022cv00790
Plaintiff:
Israel Maldonado Ramirez
Defendant:
Mendoza, Ichale, Quick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Jacques v. Quick et al
as 2:2022cv00811
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Jacques and Michael Euzel Jacques
Defendant:
R. Quick and J. Bordewick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
