Cases 31 - 40 of 4,182
Mateo Siche, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2320
Petitioner:
ANDRES EZEQUIEL MATEO SICHE, MILAGRITOS STEFANY MARCOS TEJADA, GIANELLA AYMAR GONZALES MARCOS and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gonzales v. Mayes, et al.
as 24-2281
Plaintiff:
DAVID LOPEZ GONZALES
Defendant:
KRIS MAYES, ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL, named Kristin K Mayes, Arizona Attorney General, , Maricopa County Attorney, AMANDA M. PARKER, Deputy County Attorney and others
Gonzales v. Allstate Insurance Company
as 2:2024at00424
Plaintiff:
Jean Gonzales
Defendant:
Allstate Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Cadena, et al. v. Customer Connexx, LLC, et al.
as 24-2121
Plaintiff:
CARIENE CADENA and ANDREW GONZALES
Defendant:
CUSTOMER CONNEXX, LLC and JANONE, INC.
(PC) Gonzales v. Coronado
as 1:2024cv00406
Plaintiff:
Tony Christopher Gonzales
Defendant:
A. Coronado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales v. Allstate Ins. Co.
as 2:2024cv01033
Plaintiff:
Jean Gonzales
Defendant:
Allstate Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00684
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Michael Gonzales v. Natural Factors Nutritional Products Inc.
as 2:2024cv02584
Plaintiff:
Michael Gonzales
Defendant:
Natural Factors Nutritional Products Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Cavazos v. Garsilaso, et al.
as 24-1868
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CAVAZOS
Defendant:
N. GARSILASO, J. TREJO, G. GONZALES and others
(SS) Gonzales v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00958
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Gonzales
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
